Відео

Probably the best tutorial on the spectral display I've seen from anyone so far! Well done!

so you think adobe subscribers are dumb with the facial expressions huh

oh my! so, basically, Adobe paying customers are just dumb, paranoid, and overly sensitive about protecting their own work. That´s it.... And the condescending arrogant tone, really helps to bring your point across. That´s it.... What would adobe be without us the creators? Nothing. That´s it....

Thank you soo much ❤🤩

"We don't train generative AI models on your data." - Jason Levine "I give Adobe permission to use my images and associated data to train Adobe's generative AI models." - Adobe Am I going to believe my lying eyes or Adobe and Jason Levine?

well done

How to say you hate your customers without saying you hate your customers the video. I can see why you work for adobe. You have no soul

wtfffff are you ? you talk like a sissieeeee

I miss using CS, workflow worked great for me. I spent thousands on CS a bit as a pro but most just for myself because it brought me joy. I’m disabled and on limited income. But even if I were like I use to have a fulfilling career I would never go subscription. My last purchase was grandfathered CS6 that is now unusable unless I go back to an old OS. To me art is therapeutic and losing this has been a major blow to me. Adobe you suck, yes there are other alternatives. Your software are great but your morality and ethics are loathsome.

Can you define the word "generative"? And how is a "generative AI" different from _other_ types of AI? Can you just say "we don't train any AI models with your data?" It really irks me when people don't use words correctly. So difficult to tell if ignorant or malicious.

It doesn’t help that you look like a demon with purple eyes in the first moment of the video

Where tf is effects control?!

Im not a expert in facial expressions recognition… But you are definitely disgusted with adobe users…all in behalf of adobe… 2:52 I wouldn’t forgive adobe a grain of rice after this video… poor representation of defense…

So why was there a checkbox, about training your generative AI, in settings, before it was updated, and removed?

ua-cam.com/video/tpbbschYKjE/v-deo.htmlsi=k8bMu7KFnNzMUEfU

what a sneery condescending video. And you clearly cannot comprehend that “examples” are not limiting; it doesn’t matter what examples you can cite for the various permissions being granted, if the EULA does not specifically constrain Adobe for ONLY THOSE PURPOSES then your “examples” are completely meaningless. Plus, you lied. Adobe has been usimg customer images for generative AI. There have been preference settings to specifically request this. Adobe Stock images are well understood to have been used to train AI. Adobe’s documentation specically says that stuff on Behance can be used for AI training. Perhaps what you and oher Adobe reps mean when you say ‘we do not use customer images to train AIs’ is ‘we do not use customer images to train AIs without permission’… but Adobe has a track record of sneakily obtaining that permission by using opt out flags that got turned on in our preferences, and Adobe Stock users got completely blindsided by Adobe stealing their jobs, alhough I’m sure you can point to a Adobe Stock EULA clause that Adobe uses to justify the use of the Adobe Stock library to train AI… it just wasn’t in the EULA as a clause that said ‘you agree to let Adobe destroy your livelihood’ and didn’t get noticed. Instead, it was hidden in innocuous sounding ‘common boilerplate’ just like now, and you are sneering as you misinterpret this current lot of boilerplate. Again, it doesn’t matter if the doc says: ‘like’ or for example’ or ‘such as’, it needs to say ‘soley for these specific purposes’. Or it means nothing.

0:25 Ok, Adobe people need to stop telling us Adobe DOESN'T train generative AI models on our content. The community's question has always been whether Adobe DID do that when they opted us in by default. We already know they don't anymore because the checkbox in Photoshop's Product Improvement settings has been removed since the latest software update. ua-cam.com/video/DkFpWDYwo1k/v-deo.htmlsi=m72K7D5yoLMy7bxe&t=171 Also, my condolences to all Adobe Stock contributors.

wow this video makes me want to unsub even more, shame I cant without a BS cancellation fee

Your sanctimonious tone is not a good reflection on Adobe. I’m pretty sure Adobe didn’t need you to lecture customers, and make this disaster even worse.

are they paying you enough to humiliate you like this?

*First Adobe screws customers with their restrictive and punitive subscriptions. **Then they change the unreadable terms to give themselves a licence to your work. ***Then they get some smug git who looks like an Afghan Hound to give us a condescending lecture about how we just didn't understand the big words they used. THIS is why thousands of us are leaving Adobe as fast as we can and going out of our way to learn different tools. See ya!

I am certain of Jason Levine's integrity. It's disheartening to see Adobe deploying their chief evangelists in an effort to extricate themselves from this predicament. Jason, it's unlikely you'll read this, but as with most things, it boils down to trust and integrity-qualities that Adobe, your employer, seems to have forfeited. I fully grasp that you must promote their interests and ensure the flow of Adobe's revenue. Your tone suggests a disconnect from the customers' sentiments and a lack of transparency. I believe future reflections on Adobe will reveal the company's opaque tactics in customer relations. Consequently, after years of utilizing and instructing with Adobe Premiere, I've transitioned all my professional and personal software to DaVinci Resolve, leaving no trace of Adobe applications behind. Keep Well, stay true to your heart.

Many, but not all creators care deeply about others' use of their content. Thanks for explaining the updated TOS. Sharing ain't always easy, but when we sound like these guys we're doing something wrong... :D ua-cam.com/video/x6XT7FDSdn8/v-deo.html

First of all thank you Jason for all you do. A lot of people’s anger and distrust was amplified by Adobe’s slow response to the TOS statement. It made users feel that Adobe doesn’t care. It’s an ongoing perception that this did not help. Adobe has a long way to go to build user trust back. If they want to get on top of this they should wave the cancellation fees and nip the FTC investigation and this PR disaster in the bud

OK so apart from patronising people what guarantees do you have that you won't use people's work for AI?

Hey Jason, We met in person at Max. Great overview! We’re having a livestream event for our members of Adobe Premiere Pro Editors (on FB). Hoping to have this video play during the presentation if that’s okay with you. Is there a ‘proper’ way to ask for permission? TIA

You said that "Adobe doesn't train generative AI on your data". Can you assert that Adobe (or any other third party which might have received user data from Adobe) has never, does never, and never will train generative AI on user data under past or present ToS?

Your tone is reminiscent of someone ridiculing a bunch of subscribers for being concerned. We don't know you like that and it actually hurt.

Thanks boss

The elephant in the room is missing. Cancellation fees. The government announced today it's investigating this. Adobe addressing this would be wise.

Well, I'm hyper-annoyed while maintaining thoughts of "stay calm, this is how corporations work." I'm a really casual user, not in the industry. I needed to do something with vectors and got the 14 day trial. At the end of the trial, I vaguely recall being offered a really cheap monthly plan (I guess now it was for 12 months) so being curious about the other features, I then had Creative Cloud. I really didn't mind the 20 something monthly cost but over the year, I used it only a few times. Kabong, I guess I missed an email but now I have a high 60 dollar plan. Top it off I now learn I'm stuck with it for the year. The other plan just rolled over into it rather gracefully and horribly. I just learned that to cancel, I have to pay for the whole year? Ask me now how I feel about Adobe products. Ask me now if I'd recommend them. Ask me now if I'm angry every time I see the word "Adobe" or "Creative Cloud." Ask me how happy I am about the federal lawsuit. I'm a curious senior on a fixed income. Thanks for being wonderful, Adobe.

Why didn't the TOS just explain it like you just did? Would have saved a lot of heartburn.

Love it when someone speaks in plain English instead of the legal mumble jumble. Hope all corporations can learn from this that just having a bunch of lawyers to write the terms and conditions can be counter-productive.

What the heck?? You want to tell me that Adobe doesn't look at the logo I designed and admire it??? shame!

Funny thing is in this particular video of all others where one would want to project a more “honest” look You are wearing these glasses which reflect this blue computer / led light? right over your eyes as a spooky android kind overlay giving the complete opposite subliminal message… needed a more organized setup.

seems fine to me.

The first time I saw one of those Adobe cry babies (who just hate on everything that breathes Adobe), I was like: "Can't wait for Jason's video" 😂

Good clarification. I could tell from some of the uproar when this originally was picking up steam that a lot of the language was obviously related to hosting content in Adobe's cloud and was reasonable in that context. I think there is still a concern in general though. Those were all great examples of reasonable things Adobe may do with user content but is not the limit or extent. I believe the limits or what Adobe agrees NOT to do are much less defined, so there could always be much less reasonable liberties being taken that are not stated. I also think there were some other concerning paragraphs that weren't addressed here but I'd have to go back and refresh my memory.

I think the anger is over the vague way this was presented in the first place. Users need complete transparency, not legal jargon. These terms of service should be written so the average user can understand EXACTY what they are signing. None of these specific aspects of the agreement should leave room for interpretation. I'm a professional editor and have been very frustrated by the lack of clarity. User's like myself, who spend nearly a thousand dollars a year with Adobe, just want honesty. Thanks for clarifying this, but you shouldn't have had to do this in the first place had the terms been clearly defined and not open to interpretation. I do think all users should read this newly updated agreement as it finally spells out what the terms mean.

You seem kind of spitefull....How about taking customers worries seriously?

Weird how its so nice with your c00l zoom effects explaining, but people were locked out of their account unless they agreed to the terms.

Sorry Jason, Adobe lost a lot of customers with their latest move. I loved learning from you for over a decade now. Thank you for your contributions but Adobe can kiss our collective butts.

It doesn’t need a video 😂 no one cares

Hi Jason! There is a serious bag on the audio tracks! Now it does not have names! We can see it on your video. It is very important to have names on the audio! If you have some versions of the sound, you can't undestand what the version is on the track. Could you please ask the Adobe guys to fix this? Thank you

So helpful! Coming from Avid, watching you demo pancake mode is blowing my mind.

I like this version so fresh yet not far from the original one. Love it, u should do more from the door's tracks.

Cool, I have so many questions about AE

You have abandoned Adobe Audition, Make audition a music production friendly

10:36🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂. Jokes aside, great masterclass!

How does 19 figure in the math for 3rd-order Ambisonics in ZYLIA ZM-1 3rd order Ambisonics microphone array ZYLIA ZM-1S AMBISONICS MICROPHONE ARRAY The 3rd order Ambisonics microphone array with 19 calibrated capsules (MEMS sensors), high-end 24-bit recording resolution and timecode input channel allowing for synchronization of multiple ZM-1S microphones ZYLIA ZM-1S as well as other devices connected to the recording systems such as video cameras THE MOST HUMAN-LIKE SOUND EXPERIENCE Record, create and stream 3D sound and let your audience experience the most realistic, immersive ​walk through the sound scene. ​ Created specifically to support the production of 6 Degrees of Freedom (6DoF) and VOLUMETRIC 3D audio experiences, the ZYLIA 6DoF Navigable Audio solution allows audio engineers and creatives to place multiple ZYLIA ZM-1S devices within a sound scene and to capture audio that leads to a truly immersive experience with unrestricted freedom of movement through the recorded 3D space www.zylia.co/zylia-6dof.html all text above copypasta direct from their main site: www.zylia.co Yay for Zylia! neither an Zylia employee nor fanboi for same ;-) been preyin' for this and a whole bunch more for my music since 1972, after Michael Gerzon seeming to miraculously pick-up on that all the way <-> Oxford, GB. heh heh ;-) "Through a series of experimental recordings in the chapels and music halls of Oxford, the OUTRS set on a trajectory which ultimately led to their first tetrahedral ‘Soundfield’ recording by them on the 8th May 1971. Fortunately, OUTRS member Stephen Thornton documented and diarized their activities well - it is worth taking the time to explore this rich and detailed resource for a full picture of their astonishing activities and achievements." intothesoundfield.music.ox.ac.uk/stephen-thornton-diaries enjoy now if i could merely pencil-in an invite to my old stomping-grounds at Micro$oft, their Ambisonics Spatial Audio Research Lab, plz My whining and pitching fits during my eleven years always as V-dash "Software Test Engineer I, II, then III" begging for a test position with test teams and groups directly-related with the later-termed "Immersive Audio" concepts. But nowhere in sight could it be discovered there, since Ambisonics in general had lost favor during my hiatus on Micro$oft's not-Redmond, but where the real "One Microsoft Way" resides in the "Windows Development Team" w, x, y, & z buildings on Campus as simple HID Devices -> Enterprise Server/Storage/Net including my testing the original WHQL-founded "Five-9s" (Guaran-damn-teed 99.999% Up-Time) Fault-Tolerant Enterprise Server Test Suite on said equipment, additionally including too many-to-list various other configurations of hardware, always improving the mutually-inclusive Smoothality of the best practices, protocols, procedures, & processes {my own personal "4-Ps Participation Plan" while amongst the ranks or 'food-chain' as the 'pick-your-battles' cliques would refer it all being as if some sort of pyramid scheme"} involved with seriously setting-up sourcing success-seeking scenarios {my own personal "6-Ss Stochastical Schematic"} into motion with & for manufacturers acquiring their much-coveted and well-earned "Designed For Windows" logo certifications. {résumé upon request} ;-)